Amnesty International Group 22 Pasadena/Caltech News
Volume XVIII Number 1, January 2010


UPCOMING EVENTS

Thursday, January 28, 7:30 PM. Monthly 
Meeting. Caltech Y is located off San Pasqual 
between Hill and Holliston, south side. You will 
see two curving walls forming a gate to a path-- 
our building is just beyond. Help us plan future 
actions on Sudan, the 'War on Terror', death 
penalty and more.  

Tuesday, February 9, 7:30 PM.  Letter 
writing meeting at Caltech Athenaeum, corner 
of Hill and California in Pasadena. This 
informal gathering is a great way for 
newcomers to get acquainted with Amnesty! 

Sunday, February 21, 6:30PM. Rights Readers 
Human Rights Book Discussion Group. This 
month we read "The Land of Green Plums" by 
Herta Muller.


COORDINATOR'S CORNER

 Hi everyone,

At last - a few days without the pouring rain!  
Today was a beautiful bright (although a chilly 50 
degrees) day with snow on the mountains north 
of Pasadena. Thank heavens the anticipated 
mudslides weren't as bad as forecasted.
Last month Group 22 members met with the new 
field organizer for the Western Regional office in 
San Francisco, Kalaya'an Mendoza, in a local 
restaurant.

He wants to organize and bring together the local 
amnesty groups in the LA County area for more 
effective leadership and activism. He is a very 
personable young man with a lot of great ideas.
All enjoyed meeting and getting to know him. We 
also met him this month for a follow-up meeting 
and look forward to working together.

Words cannot describe the horrifying scenes we 
all have watched on television recently as the 
massive earthquake and aftershocks have hit the 
nation of Haiti. Haiti is the poorest country in the 
western hemisphere with a long history of 
dictators ruling the island. However, it is 
heartening to see the worldwide efforts to help 
rescue survivors and give needed medical care 
and supplies. Amnesty has a list of organizations 
you can donate to at 
http://www.amnestyusa.org/all-
countries/haiti/page.do?id=1011166.  I used to 
sponsor a child in Guatemala through World 
Vision, so we gave them some money.

Group 22 has a new POC. Read Wen Chen's 
article on Gao Zhisheng following this column.

Con carino,
Kathy


PRISONER OF CONSCIENCE 
GAO ZHISHENG

By Wen Chen

AI Group 22 recently adopted a new POC -- 
Chinese human rights lawyer Gao Zhisheng. Gao, 
a Christian and a self-taught lawyer, had been 
practicing as an attorney since 1994 and in 2000 
established his Beijing law office. In 2001, China's 
Ministry of Justice rated him one of China's top 
10 lawyers due to his pro bono work. Gao has 
been defending Chinese people against human 
rights abuses, religious persecution, corruption, 
environmental degradation and land 
appropriation committed by the Chinese 
communist regime.  

In 2005, Mr. Gao wrote an open letter to the 
Chinese government leaders defending the regime-
persecuted meditation practice Falun Gong. 
Responding to this open letter, the Chinese 
authorities suspended Gao's law office in 2005. 
Since then, Mr Gao and his family has been 
shadowed, persecuted and repeatedly arrested 
by the Chinese authorities. 

On February 4, 2006, Gao began a hunger strike in 
response to the regime's increasing persecution of 
human right activists after the bloody crackdown 
on Taishi and Shanwei village in late 2005. Gao's 
hunger strike was supported by numerous human 
rights activists both inside and outside China.  He 
was arrested on August 15, 2006, in Dongying 
city after he went to support the blind human 
rights activist Cheng Guangchen in court (who 
was persecuted due to his investigation of local 
authorities in their dealing with "family planning 
policy").  He was tortured and spent 600 hours in 
handcuffs. After more than 3 months in detention 
without trial, on Dec. 13, 2006, the Beijing 
Municipal No 1 Court opened the trial against 
Gao without his lawyer and family around.  By 
Dec 22, 2006, Gao was sentenced to a three-year 
suspended prison sentence for "inciting 
subversion".  

After he returned back to his family, Gao, with 
his wife, their daughter and son, was in 24-hour 
house arrest, supervised and harassed by 20 
policemen.

On Saturday, Sept. 22, 2007, Gao was taken from 
his home by police, right after his 16-page open 
letter sent to the United States Congress was 
published during the press conference inside US 
Congress on Sept. 20, 2007, in which he 
expressed his deep concerns over the worsening 
deterioration of human rights in China, especially 
innocent Falun Gong practitioners, ahead of the 
2008 Beijing Olympics. His present whereabouts 
are unknown. "The situation is as worse as when 
Gao was arrested last time", according to his 
wife. She and children were under tight control by 
the authorities and their life was in an extreme 
threat and pressure. 

In November 2007, Gao was taken by the police 
to a secret location where he suffered cruel 
physical and psychological tortures for nearly 60 
days. According to the insider, among other 
tortures, Gao Zhisheng was stripped naked, 
attacked with electric batons and deprived of 
sleep, the same methods used on Falun Gong 
practitioners. Gao had considered suicide to 
escape the cruelty he suffered. With the Beijing 
Olympic Games taking place, the Chinese 
communist regime secretly removed Gao's family 
from Beijing.

The US Congress passed a Resolution on April 7, 
2006, to urge China to cease its harassment of Mr. 
Gao Zhisheng. The European Parliament passed a 
resolution condemning his arrest in September 
2006. The Belgian Senate on October 26, 2006, 
also passed resolutions to express their concern 
about Gao Zhisheng.

On December 6, 2006, Gao received the Human 
Rights Fighter Award from the Asia-Pacific 
Human Rights Watch Charitable Trust. Gao was 
awarded the 2007 Courageous Advocacy Award 
by the American Board of Trial Advocates 
(ABOTA).  On June 28, 2007, Gao was one of the 
three winners of the Austrian Bruno Kreisky prize 
for human rights. 

Gao's wife and two children escaped to the 
United States in early 2009. Gao Zhisheng has 
been missing since Feb. 2009. The Chinese 
authorities refused to reveal his whereabouts. 


RIGHTS READERS
Human Rights Book Discussion Group

Keep up with Rights Readers at 
http://rightsreaders.blogspot.com

Next Rights Readers meeting: 
Sunday, February 21, 6:30 PM
Vroman's Bookstore
695 E. Colorado Boulevard
 In Pasadena

"The Land of Green Plums" 
By Herta Mueller

Author Biography

Herta Mueller Biography: Herta Mueller was born
on 17 August 1953, in Nitchidorf, Timis County, 
Romania, the daughter of Swabian farmers. She is 
a Romanian-born German novelist, poet and 
essayist noted for her works depicting the harsh 
conditions of life in Romania under Ceau_escu. 
Her family was part of Romania's German 
minority; her father had served in the Waffen SS 
and her mother was deported to a labour camp in 
the Soviet Union after World War II. She studied 
German studies and Romanian literature at the 
Timi_oara University.

Herta Mueller began working as a translator 
for an engineering company in 1976, but was 
dismissed in 1979 for her refusal to cooperate 
with the Securitate, the Communist regime's secret 
police. Initially, she made a living by teaching 
kindergarten and giving private German lessons. 
Her first book was published in Romania 
BUMBACLAARRT (in German) in 1982, and 
appeared only in a censored version, as with 
most publications of the time.

Mueller left for Germany with her husband, 
novelist Richard Wagner, in 1987. Over the 
following years she received many lectureships at 
universities in Germany and abroad. She currently 
lives in Berlin. Mueller received membership of the 
German Academy for Writing and Poetry in 1995, 
and other positions followed. In 1997 she 
withdrew from the PEN centre of Germany in 
protest of its merge with the former German 
Democratic Republic branch. In July 2008, Mueller 
sent a critical open letter to Horia-Roman 
Patapievici, president of the Romanian Cultural 
Institute in reaction to the support given by the 
institute to a Romanian-German Summer School 
involving two former informants of the Securitate.

The Nobel Foundation awarded the 2009 Nobel
Prize in Literature to Mueller "who, with the 
concentration of poetry and the frankness of 
prose, depicts the landscape of the 
dispossessed."


Book Review

Strangers in a Strange Land
By Larry Wolff

Published: December 1, 1996

From the New York Times

  HERTA MULLER'S third novel begins in a 
women's university dormitory in Nicolae 
Ceausescu's Romania, where Lola, a poor girl 
from the provinces, has come to study Russian. In 
a Communist country short on consumer goods, 
Lola and her roommates dream of ''whisper-thin'' 
nylon stockings while making do with what they 
have: ''Under the pillows in the beds were six 
pots of mascara. Six girls spat into the pots and 
stirred the soot with toothpicks until the black 
paste grew sticky. Then they opened their eyes 
wide. The toothpicks scraped against their 
eyelids, their lashes grew black and thick. But an 
hour later gray gaps began to crack open in the 
eyelashes. The saliva dried up and the soot 
crumbled onto their cheeks.'' 

Lola, unprepared for city life by her village 
childhood, has brutal sexual encounters, hangs 
herself with a belt and is posthumously expelled 
from the Communist Party. The narrator of the 
novel is one of her roommates, soon herself an 
object of political suspicion, so that when she 
finally leaves the university, packing her pot of 
mascara, she finds an unpleasant surprise in her 
bed: ''When I picked up the blanket to pull off the 
cover, I found a pig's ear in the middle of the 
sheet. That was the girls' way of saying farewell. I 
shook the sheet but the ear didn't move, it was 
sewn on in the middle like a button.'' 

''The Land of Green Plums'' is a novel of 
graphically observed detail in which the author 
seeks to create a sort of poetry out of the spiritual 
and material ugliness of life in Communist 
Romania. The book was not, however, written in 
Romanian. Herta Muller is a German writer who 
lived in Romania as part of that country's German 
minority; in 1987, she left Romania for Germany, 
where her novels have been published and 
acclaimed. 

In the 18th century, the Hapsburg rulers in 
Vienna encouraged German settlers to pioneer the 
Hungarian lands that had recently been regained 
from the Ottoman Empire. Some of these lands, 
with their descendant German communities, 
passed to Romania after World War I, and the 
German minority there, receiving special 
protection during Romania's alliance with Hitler, 
maintained its distinctive national character into 
the era of Communist rule. Ceausescu, seeking to 
mobilize Romanian nationalism around his 
dictatorship, perpetrated the general harassment 
of the German minority, which Ms. Muller 
experienced as a young woman in the 70's and 
80's, and which she has worked into fiction in this 
novel about relentless persecution in a police 
state. 

''My mother tongue is German,'' Ms. Muller 
said in a 1989 interview with Amnesty 
International. Like Kafka writing German in 
Prague, Ms. Muller in Romania found in her 
mother tongue the painfully direct expression of 
profound alienation. Michael Hofmann has 
produced a powerful English translation, though 
since an important purpose of the novel is to 
represent cultural survival through the German 
language, any translation necessarily obscures 
some of the work's significance. Furthermore, the 
issue of Germanness in the novel is very much 
attuned to the national sensitivities of German 
readers today. The narrator and her friends, 
persecuted as dissidents in Romania, must also 
confront their own family histories of sentimental 
loyalty to Hitler. ''My father was a member of the 
SS; I know what I'm talking about,'' Ms. Muller 
commented in the 1989 interview. In the novel, the 
narrator feels inevitably awkward in relation to 
Romania's Jewish survivors: ''It was Herr 
Feyerabend. He was shuffling his feet and pulled 
a white handkerchief out of his pocket. I 
withdrew my head, as if the white handkerchief 
could feel that someone like myself was staring at 
a Jew.'' While the narrator may look away from 
the handkerchief, Ms. Muller unflinchingly 
confronts the complexity of the 20th century in 
Eastern Europe, with its terrible permutations of 
persecution from generation to generation. 

The narrator watches the Romanian police 
guards in the streets of the city as they greedily 
pocket green plums. She herself had been warned 
as a child, by her father, that it was dangerous to 
eat green plums, but the guards do not hesitate: 
''They knew where the plum trees were in every 
precinct they policed. . . . The plumsuckers were 
peasants. The green plums made them stupid. 
They ate themselves away from their duty. They 
reverted to childhood, stealing plums from village 
trees.'' 

Ms. Muller's vision of a police state manned 
by plum thieves reads like a kind of fairy tale on 
the mingled evils of gluttony, stupidity and 
brutality. The narrator watches the guards as they 
grab at young women in the streets. It might have 
been one of these men who followed Lola and 
mauled her, with ''the greedy desire of a starved 
dog.'' As the narrator ponders Lola's pathetic 
fate, the novel encompasses not only the political 
persecution of dissidents and the harassment of a 
national minority but also the particular kinds of 
oppression and vulnerability that women 
experience under a regime of policemen. Most of 
the literary accounts of Communist Eastern 
Europe have come from male writers, and it is 
especially interesting to have from Ms. Muller this 
work composed in a woman's voice. 

In the end, the narrator decides not to kill 
herself, as Lola did, but to immigrate to Germany, 
as most of Romania's Germans have done, both 
before and since the fall of Ceausescu in 1989. 
This marks the end of many communities that 
had survived from the 18th-century reign of the 
Empress Maria Theresa into our own less 
enlightened century. Ms. Muller conveys a certain 
sadness over the historical implications of 
emigration, the impending doom of her own 
native culture and society. She also offers a 
potent and repellent depiction of the world she 
left behind in Romania. A friend of the narrator 
works as an engineer in a slaughterhouse: ''Kurt 
told me every week about the slaughterhouse. The 
workers drank warm blood when they 
slaughtered the animals. They stole organ meats 
and brains. . . . Their wives and children are 
accomplices, Kurt said. The wives use the stiff 
cow tails for bottle brushes, and the children get 
the supple ones to play with.'' ''The Land of Green 
Plums'' addresses issues of vampirish complicity 
in the bloody rituals of an oppressive regime, 
whose hungry subjects, whether stealing fresh 
offal or green plums, ingest political poisons with 
historically protracted, corrosive consequences. 

Larry Wolff, the author of ''Inventing Eastern 
Europe,'' teaches European history at Boston 
College.


PROGRESS TOWARDS ABOLITION 
OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN 2009

 By Stevi Carroll

Two more countries, Burundi and Togo, 
abolished the death penalty in 2009, bringing the 
total of countries that are abolitionist in law or 
practice to 139, or more than two-thirds of the 
nations of the world. 139 is also the number of 
people who have been exonerated from U.S. 
death rows since 1973. Nine of those 
exonerations came this year. And one more state, 
New Mexico, abolished capital punishment in 
2009, bringing the total of abolitionist states to 
fifteen. Thanks to all who took action for death 
penalty abolition this year!

Source: http://www.amnestyusa.org/death-
penalty/page.do?id=1011005

For a list of upcoming executions, updated 
January 22, 2010, in the USA, go to 
http://www.amnestyusa.org/death-
penalty/pending-
executions/page.do?id=1011587

This site also allows us to take action on 
behalf of prisoners from Ohio who face execution 
soon.


GUANTANAMO PRISON 

Submitted by Stevi Carroll

Because our most recent Rights Readers book 
was My Guantanamo Diary: The Detainees and the 
Stories They Told Me by Mahvish Khan, I thought 
it would be interesting to see what Amnesty 
International USA has posted on this issue. 

US continues to look the other way on 
'war on terror' abuses

20 January 2010

"A commitment to human rights starts with 
universal standards and with holding everyone 
accountable to those standards, including 
ourselves... When injustice anywhere is ignored, 
justice everywhere is denied. Acknowledging and 
remedying mistakes does not make us weaker, it 
reaffirms the strengths of our principles and 
institutions."

 Not Amnesty International's words, but those 
of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton last 
month in an address on the Obama 
administration's "Human Rights Agenda for the 
21stCentury". - Accountability, she said, was 
elemental to the administration's approach, and it 
was under this principle that President Barack 
Obama had ordered an end to CIA torture and 
closure of the Guantanamo detention facility.

 While Secretary Clinton's words are welcome, 
the fact is that a year into the new 
administration, almost 200 individuals remain 
detained without fair trial at the Guantanamo 
prison camp, and accountability and remedy for 
the human rights violations committed against 
these and other detainees in what the USA 
previously called the "war on terror" remain more 
myth than reality.

 It is nearly eight years, for example, since 
Abu Zubaydah was arrested in Pakistan. He was 
hidden away in secret CIA custody for the first 
four and a half years, subjected to torture and 
enforced disappearance, crimes under 
international law for which no-one has been 
brought to justice. For the past three years he has 
been in Guantanamo, still held without charge or 
access to remedy. The Obama administration 
continues to resist disclosure of what happened 
to him and others held in secret CIA custody.

 Information which the administration had 
wanted to keep classified emerged in federal 
court earlier this month in the case of Ahmed 
Khalfan Ghailani, namely that he had been 
subjected to "enhanced interrogation techniques" 
for 14 hours over five days at some point in secret 
CIA custody.

 In its written briefing to the court, the Obama 
administration argued that its predecessor had 
"justifiably" treated Ghailani as an "intelligence 
asset" rather than a criminal defendant, despite a 
pre-existing indictment in US federal court 
against him at the time of his arrest in Pakistan in 
2004.

 It added that the Bush administration had 
made the "entirely reasonable" decision to 
continue to hold Ghailani without charge as an 
"enemy combatant". Ahmed Ghailani was held in 
secret CIA custody for two years, and in 
Guantanamo for nearly three more years, before 
being transferred to New York for trial in June 
2009. No one has been brought to account for the 
human rights violations perpetrated against him.

 The impunity goes well beyond abuses in the 
CIA programme. Shortly before President Obama 
took office, for example, the Bush 
administration's Convening Authority for military 
commissions confirmed that Saudi Arabian 
national Mohamed al Qahtani had been tortured 
in military custody at Guant‡namo. Despite this 
admission, a year later, with Mohamed al 
Qahtani still held without charge in Guant‡namo, 
no criminal investigation is known to have been 
opened into the torture allegations.

 Earlier this month, a US federal judge found 
"credible" the allegations that Yemeni national 
Musa'ab al Madhwani had been subjected to acts 
amounting to torture and other ill-treatment in a 
secret US facility in Kabul before his transfer to 
Guantanamo where he remains detained without 
charge more than seven years later.

 What accountability will there be for this 
abuse? None, it would seem, unless the current 
administration has a rethink about whether 
accountability and adherence to the USA's 
international human rights obligations will truly 
be among its governing principles.

 In litigation implicating the USA's 
international obligations to ensure accountability 
and remedy for past human rights violations, the 
Obama administration has all too often adopted 
a stance that promotes impunity and blocks 
remedy. For example, in its first year it has:

- 	invoked the state secrets privilege to seek 
dismissal of a lawsuit brought by five detainees 
for the human rights violations, including crimes 
under international law, they say they were 
subjected to in the CIA "rendition" programme;

- 	opposed a lawsuit brought by four UK 
nationals for the torture and arbitrary detention 
to which they say they were subjected in 
Guantanamo, the administration arguing that it 
was "not clearly established" at the time of the 
men's detention that they had the rights they said 
were violated and that the officials concerned 
were therefore "shielded" from civil liability. In 
December, the US Supreme Court sided with the 
administration and declined to take the case;

- 	intervened to petition a federal court to 
dismiss a lawsuit filed against John Yoo, a former 
Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the US 
Justice Department, for the role the lawsuit claims 
he played in unlawful detention conditions and 
interrogation techniques. The Obama 
administration argued that the context of "the 
detention and treatment of those determined to 
be enemies during an armed conflict... implicating 
matters of national security and war powers" 
counselled against the "judicial creation of a 
money-damage remedy";

- 	maintained the Bush administration's 
denial of and opposition to access to lawyers and 
courts for those held at the US airbase in Bagram 
in Afghanistan, cementing the accountability gap 
for abuses committed there and the detainees' 
lack of effective remedy for them;

- 	refused to release of photographs and 
other documentary material relating to detainee 
abuses.

 When the USA assumed its seat on the UN 
Human Rights Council in 2009, the Obama 
administration said: "Make no mistake; the 
United States will not look the other way in the 
face of serious human rights abuses. The truth 
must be told, the facts brought to light and the 
consequences faced". A year on, the 
administration continues to look the other way 
when it comes to full disclosure of and remedy for 
human rights violations perpetrated by the USA 
in the name of "countering terrorism".

 The change of tone the Obama administration 
has brought to the USA's pronouncements on 
human rights is welcome. It must now match these 
words with concrete action, including on 
accountability, remedy, and ending the 
Guantanamo detentions in line with its 
international human rights obligations.

Source: 
http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?id
=ENGNAU2010012015042&lang=e


MONTHLY LETTER COUNT

Preprinted Postcards 22
UAs                  21
Total                43
To add your letters to the total contact 
lwkamp@gmail.com.


Amnesty International Group 22
The Caltech Y
Mail Code 5-62
Pasadena, CA 91125
www.its.caltech.edu/~aigp22/
http://rightsreaders.blogspot.com